Synthetic / analytic
Analytic judgments merely unfold what is already contained in the concept; synthetic ones extend knowledge. Kant's guiding question: how are synthetic judgments a priori possible?
In an analytic judgment the predicate is already contained in the subject concept (“all bodies are extended”) — it merely unpacks what one already thinks. A synthetic judgment adds something new to the concept and so extends knowledge; usually it rests on experience.
The special case are judgments that are synthetic and a priori at once: they extend knowledge and yet hold necessarily and universally — like “7 + 5 = 12”, where twelve is not contained in the concepts of seven and five. Explaining how they are possible is the central task of the “Critique of Pure Reason”.
Try it yourself
Where it appears
- Knowledge — Four ways of judging
- Critique of Pure Reason
- Teaching — 4 · Theory of knowledge: rationalism, empiricism, Kant's turn
Source: Wikipedia: Synthetic / analytic